From Salovey and Mayer's 1990 definition to current reviews: the most-cited emotional intelligence papers, the ability versus trait debate and search strings.
Emotional intelligence research is split between models that do not measure the same thing. The ability model (Salovey and Mayer, 1990; Mayer, Caruso and Salovey, 1999) treats it as a set of skills and an intelligence. The trait model (Petrides and Furnham, 2001) treats it as a constellation of traits and self-perceived abilities, examined alongside personality. State which one you are using in your first paragraph, because your choice of scale follows from it.
How the literature is organised
Salovey and Mayer (1990) presented emotional intelligence as a set of skills for appraising and expressing emotion accurately, regulating it effectively, and using feelings to motivate, plan and achieve. Mayer, Caruso and Salovey then argued that it meets the traditional standards for an intelligence (Mayer et al., 1999), and Mayer, Salovey and Caruso (2000) compared the models that had appeared by then.
The division between ability and trait still organises the literature. Petrides and Furnham (2001) set out the theoretical foundation of trait emotional intelligence as a constellation of traits and self-perceived abilities and located it in relation to established personality factors. Llamas-Díaz et al. (2022) distinguish three families of measure in the studies they pool: performance-based ability, self-report ability and self-report mixed. Say which kind your scale is.
Main debates
The long-running debate is what emotional intelligence is and whether it is an intelligence at all, which is the claim in the title of Mayer et al. (1999). Mayer, Roberts and Barsade (2008), in the Annual Review of Psychology, review three approaches and conclude that specific-ability and integrative-model approaches conceptualise and measure it adequately. A practical consequence is that you should not pool findings from different kinds of measure without checking, as Llamas-Díaz et al. (2022) do, whether the type of measure moderates the result.
Where recent work is heading
Recent citations cluster around applications: leadership in schools and work teams, nursing education, the wellbeing of health-care staff and adolescent adjustment. Reviews published since 2021 cover measures (Bru-Luna et al., 2021), school leaders (Gómez-Leal et al., 2022) and adolescent wellbeing (Llamas-Díaz et al., 2022). When the list was compiled, an editor left out some highly cited recent records whose citation counts looked implausible for their venue and age. Check the journal before you rely on any recent paper, here or elsewhere.
Most-cited foundational papers
Published before 2021 and ranked by how often later work cites them. Read the abstract of each and the full text of the three or four closest to your question. Citation count measures attention, not quality, so treat this as a map of what the field has argued about rather than a ranking of what is true.
K V Petrides, Adrian Furnham (2001). European Journal of Personality.
Cited by 1,985doi:10.1002/per.416
Most-cited papers since 2021
Primary studies and conceptual papers from 2021 onwards. A paper published in 2024 has had a few years to accumulate citations where the works in the section above have had decades, so compare these counts with each other rather than with the ones above.
Lalatendu Kesari Jena (2022). International Journal of Organizational Analysis.
Cited by 120doi:10.1108/ijoa-06-2020-2279
Recent reviews and meta-analyses
The fastest way into a literature. A good review gives you the structure of the field, a reference list to mine and, in its limitations section, the gaps other researchers have already spotted.
Desirée Llamas‐Díaz and 3 others (2022). Journal of Adolescence.
Cited by 113Open accessdoi:10.1002/jad.12075
How big the literature is, and where it is published
OpenAlex indexes 37,629 works whose title matches this topic. The chart shows how many were published each year from 2000 to 2025; the current year is left out because it is incomplete.
Show the numbers as a table
Year
Works
2000
110
2001
132
2002
195
2003
237
2004
267
2005
298
2006
430
2007
426
2008
590
2009
702
2010
823
2011
1,012
2012
1,203
2013
1,241
2014
1,528
2015
1,532
2016
1,655
2017
1,639
2018
1,779
2019
2,076
2020
2,232
2021
2,118
2022
1,925
2023
2,254
2024
2,975
2025
3,978
Journals behind the most-cited work
Counted across the 342 most-cited works on the topic, not across everything published. Browsing recent issues of the first two or three is a reliable way to find current work that has not yet been cited much.
Personality and Individual Differences36 papers
Frontiers in Psychology24 papers
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health10 papers
Sustainability7 papers
Behavioral Sciences6 papers
Journal of Organizational Behavior6 papers
Leadership & Organization Development Journal6 papers
The Leadership Quarterly6 papers
Search strings to copy
Written for databases that accept Boolean operators (Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC, PubMed, EBSCO). Quotation marks keep a phrase together, an asterisk stands in for the end of a word, and OR groups go in brackets. British and American spellings are written out with OR rather than covered by a single-character wildcard, because those wildcards differ between databases: PubMed’s help page documents the asterisk only, and asks for at least four characters before it. Limit the search to title and abstract first; widen it only if you get too little. Our guide to starting a literature review covers how to record what you searched.
Emotional intelligence and leadership
"emotional intelligence" AND (leadership OR leader* OR "transformational leadership") AND (performance OR effectiveness)
Emotional intelligence in nursing and health professions
"emotional intelligence" AND (nurs* OR "health professional*" OR "medical student*") AND (burnout OR stress OR "clinical performance")
Measurement
"emotional intelligence" AND (scale OR measure* OR psychometric OR validation) AND (trait OR ability)
Explore emotional intelligence in Wonders →Opens Wonders on this question. Once you are signed in it becomes a project with suggested sub-topics and keywords you can edit before searching. The trial is 14 days.
Sub-topics to narrow into
A thesis-sized question usually sits inside one of these, combined with a population or a setting.
Ability versus trait emotional intelligence
Mayer, Salovey and Caruso (2004, 2008) for ability; Petrides and Furnham (2001) for trait.
Measurement
Schutte et al. (1998) developed and validated a measure; Wong and Law (2002) is the most-cited leadership study on this page. Bru-Luna et al. (2021) systematically review the measures.
Reviews connect emotional intelligence with nursing education and with protection against burnout.
Adolescent wellbeing and behaviour
Llamas-Díaz et al. (2022) meta-analyse the association with subjective wellbeing in adolescents.
How to cite these papers
Every paper above has a DOI, a part of the reference that is easy to leave out. Here is one of them, “Emotional Intelligence” (1990), in the two styles students ask about most:
APA 7th edition
Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 9(3), 185–211. https://doi.org/10.2190/dugg-p24e-52wk-6cdg
MLA 9th edition
Salovey, Peter, and John D. Mayer. “Emotional Intelligence.” Imagination, Cognition and Personality, vol. 9, no. 3, 1990, pp. 185–211, https://doi.org/10.2190/dugg-p24e-52wk-6cdg.
Check the details against the article itself before you submit: databases, including the one behind this page, sometimes carry the online-first year rather than the volume year. Full rules and more examples are in our guides to APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, Vancouver and ABNT, with the rest in the citation guides. You can also format a reference from its DOI with our free citation tools.
Frequently asked questions
Who first defined emotional intelligence?
The most-cited definition is that of Peter Salovey and John Mayer, in a 1990 article in Imagination, Cognition and Personality. Daniel Goleman's 1995 book Emotional Intelligence is a trade book, has no DOI and is not listed here. Academic writing should cite Salovey and Mayer for the definition.
Should I cite Goleman in a literature review?
You can cite Goleman (1995) when you are writing about the book itself, but build your argument on peer-reviewed sources. Mayer, Salovey and Caruso (2000) compare models of emotional intelligence, and Mayer, Roberts and Barsade (2008) review three approaches to it and which of them conceptualise and measure it adequately.
Which emotional intelligence scale is most used in student research?
We have no usage data. The most-cited scale-development paper on this page is Schutte et al. (1998). Check the terms of use of any scale with its authors or publisher, and consult Bru-Luna et al. (2021), a systematic review of emotional intelligence measures, before choosing.
How this page was made
The lists come from OpenAlex, an open index of scholarly works whose data are published under a CC0 licence, queried on September 21, 2026 for works whose title matches "emotional intelligence". Only works with a DOI are listed. Each one was checked against the publisher’s own record at Crossref or DataCite (title, year, first author, journal, volume and pages), and in three cases, where the publisher deposited no byline, against PubMed; anything OpenAlex or Crossref flags as retracted was left out, and an editor took out results that matched the words but not the subject. Citation counts are OpenAlex’s on that date and are usually lower than Google Scholar’s, which counts more kinds of document. Ranking by citations tells you what a field has relied on, not what is correct; several heavily cited papers on any topic are cited because later work disputes them. Books without a DOI are missing, which matters in fields where the founding text is a book.