The Six Cities study, PM2.5 and cardiovascular disease, global burden estimates and new evidence at low concentrations, with reviews and search strings.
The most-cited cohort study on this page is Dockery et al. (1993), the Harvard Six Cities study, which linked air pollution to mortality after adjusting for smoking. Pope and Dockery (2006) review the evidence that followed, and Brook et al. (2010) is the American Heart Association statement on particulate matter and cardiovascular disease. Global burden estimates (Cohen et al., 2017; Lelieveld et al., 2015) quantify attributable deaths. Recent highly cited work tests associations at concentrations below existing limit values, in large European cohort analyses published in 2021 and 2022.
How the literature is organised
The field is built on epidemiology. Dockery et al. (1993) estimated the effect of air pollution on mortality with cohort data from six US cities, controlling for individual risk factors, and time-series studies such as Schwartz (1999) on hospital admissions for heart disease in eight US counties showed short-term effects. Pope and Dockery (2006) drew the lines of evidence together in a long critical review, and Brunekreef and Holgate (2002) did the same for a clinical readership in The Lancet.
Mechanism and outcome-specific work followed. Brook et al. (2010) reviewed the evidence on cardiovascular disease for the American Heart Association and concluded that the relationship with fine particles is causal. Kampa and Castanas (2008) review the human health effects of air pollution in general, and Kim, Kabir and Kabir (2015) those of airborne particulate matter.
A third group quantifies burden. Lelieveld et al. (2015) apportioned premature mortality to source categories, and Cohen et al. (2017) reported 25-year trends in the burden of disease attributable to ambient air pollution.
Main debates
The American Heart Association writing group judged the evidence consistent with a causal relationship between fine particles and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality (Brook et al., 2010). The open questions in the listed papers are of a different kind. One is whether associations persist below current limit values, which Strak et al. (2021) and Stafoggia et al. (2022) were designed to test. Another is whether particles from different sources are equally toxic: Lelieveld et al. (2015) assume that they are and then vary the assumption in a sensitivity analysis. A third is how to separate correlated pollutants, which Schwartz (1999) addressed by comparing counties where particles, carbon monoxide and weather were correlated to different degrees. Burden estimates depend on the exposure-response functions chosen (Cohen et al., 2017).
Where recent work is heading
Large cohorts now test low concentrations (Stafoggia et al., 2022; Strak et al., 2021). Health impact assessments for individual cities (Khomenko et al., 2021; Southerland et al., 2022) and source apportionment at global scale (McDuffie et al., 2021) bring the evidence closer to policy. Fisher et al. (2021) examine air pollution and development in Africa, where household air pollution is still the predominant form but is declining while ambient pollution increases.
Most-cited foundational papers
Published before 2021 and ranked by how often later work cites them. Read the abstract of each and the full text of the three or four closest to your question. Citation count measures attention, not quality, so treat this as a map of what the field has argued about rather than a ranking of what is true.
Ki-Hyun Kim, Ehsanul Kabir, Shamin Kabir (2015). Environment International.
Cited by 3,000doi:10.1016/j.envint.2014.10.005
Most-cited papers since 2021
Primary studies and conceptual papers from 2021 onwards. A paper published in 2024 has had a few years to accumulate citations where the works in the section above have had decades, so compare these counts with each other rather than with the ones above.
The fastest way into a literature. A good review gives you the structure of the field, a reference list to mine and, in its limitations section, the gaps other researchers have already spotted.
Tun Z. Maung and 4 others (2022). International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.
Cited by 349Open accessdoi:10.3390/ijerph19148752
How big the literature is, and where it is published
OpenAlex indexes 19,150 works whose title matches this topic. The chart shows how many were published each year from 2000 to 2025; the current year is left out because it is incomplete.
Show the numbers as a table
Year
Works
2000
192
2001
121
2002
140
2003
199
2004
201
2005
221
2006
250
2007
260
2008
252
2009
279
2010
324
2011
412
2012
339
2013
485
2014
464
2015
583
2016
708
2017
657
2018
917
2019
988
2020
1,205
2021
1,213
2022
1,275
2023
1,286
2024
1,407
2025
1,686
Journals behind the most-cited work
Counted across the 379 most-cited works on the topic, not across everything published. Browsing recent issues of the first two or three is a reliable way to find current work that has not yet been cited much.
Environmental Health Perspectives36 papers
Environment International21 papers
Environmental Research21 papers
The Lancet Planetary Health18 papers
The Science of The Total Environment15 papers
Environmental Science & Technology12 papers
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health11 papers
Circulation9 papers
Search strings to copy
Written for databases that accept Boolean operators (Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC, PubMed, EBSCO). Quotation marks keep a phrase together, an asterisk stands in for the end of a word, and OR groups go in brackets. British and American spellings are written out with OR rather than covered by a single-character wildcard, because those wildcards differ between databases: PubMed’s help page documents the asterisk only, and asks for at least four characters before it. Limit the search to title and abstract first; widen it only if you get too little. Our guide to starting a literature review covers how to record what you searched.
Long-term exposure and mortality
("air pollution" OR "PM2.5" OR "fine particulate matter" OR "nitrogen dioxide") AND (mortality OR "cardiovascular" OR stroke) AND (cohort OR "long-term exposure")
Children and respiratory health
("air pollution" OR "PM2.5" OR "traffic-related") AND (child* OR asthma OR "lung function" OR "respiratory") AND (exposure OR association)
Household air pollution
("household air pollution" OR "indoor air pollution" OR "solid fuel*" OR "biomass fuel") AND (health OR women OR child* OR "respiratory")
Explore air pollution and health in Wonders →Opens Wonders on this question. Once you are signed in it becomes a project with suggested sub-topics and keywords you can edit before searching. The trial is 14 days.
Sub-topics to narrow into
A thesis-sized question usually sits inside one of these, combined with a population or a setting.
Cohort studies and mortality
Dockery et al. (1993) and, at low concentrations, Stafoggia et al. (2022) and Strak et al. (2021).
Cardiovascular disease
Brook et al. (2010); the umbrella review by de Bont et al. (2022).
Global burden and sources
Cohen et al. (2017), Lelieveld et al. (2015) and McDuffie et al. (2021) on source sectors.
Household air pollution
Maung et al. (2022) review indoor particulate matter and the health of vulnerable groups.
Khomenko et al. (2021) on European cities; Diener and Mudu (2021) on vegetation.
How to cite these papers
Every paper above has a DOI, a part of the reference that is easy to leave out. Here is one of them, “Health Effects of Fine Particulate Air Pollution: Lines that Connect” (2006), in the two styles students ask about most:
APA 7th edition
Pope, C. A., III, & Dockery, D. W. (2006). Health effects of fine particulate air pollution: Lines that connect. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 56(6), 709–742. https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.2006.10464485
MLA 9th edition
Pope, C. Arden, III, and Douglas W. Dockery. “Health Effects of Fine Particulate Air Pollution: Lines That Connect.” Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, vol. 56, no. 6, 2006, pp. 709–42, https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.2006.10464485.
Check the details against the article itself before you submit: databases, including the one behind this page, sometimes carry the online-first year rather than the volume year. Full rules and more examples are in our guides to APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, Vancouver and ABNT, with the rest in the citation guides. You can also format a reference from its DOI with our free citation tools.
Frequently asked questions
What was the Harvard Six Cities study?
A prospective cohort study that followed more than 8,000 adults in six US cities for 14 to 16 years. Dockery et al. (1993) found that mortality was associated with fine particulate air pollution after adjusting for smoking and other risk factors.
How many deaths are attributed to air pollution?
Cohen et al. (2017), from the Global Burden of Disease study, estimated 4.2 million deaths in 2015 attributable to ambient fine particulate matter. Lelieveld et al. (2015) estimated 3.3 million premature deaths a year from outdoor air pollution and broke them down by source. Estimates differ with the exposure-response function used, so quote the source and year.
Is there a safe level of air pollution?
The recent cohort studies listed here did not find one. Analyses of pooled European cohorts (Strak et al., 2021) and of 28 million people in seven administrative cohorts (Stafoggia et al., 2022) found associations with mortality at concentrations below current limit values. The World Health Organization updated its global air quality guidelines on 22 September 2021, recommending new levels for six pollutants and citing evidence of harm at lower concentrations than previously understood since its last global update in 2005 (WHO news release, https://www.who.int/news/item/22-09-2021-new-who-global-air-quality-guidelines-aim-to-save-millions-of-lives-from-air-pollution).
How this page was made
The lists come from OpenAlex, an open index of scholarly works whose data are published under a CC0 licence, queried on September 21, 2026 for works whose title matches (("air pollution" OR "particulate matter" OR "PM2.5") AND (health OR mortality OR disease OR diseases OR hospital)). Only works with a DOI are listed. Each one was checked against the publisher’s own record at Crossref or DataCite (title, year, first author, journal, volume and pages), and in three cases, where the publisher deposited no byline, against PubMed; anything OpenAlex or Crossref flags as retracted was left out, and an editor took out results that matched the words but not the subject. Citation counts are OpenAlex’s on that date and are usually lower than Google Scholar’s, which counts more kinds of document. Ranking by citations tells you what a field has relied on, not what is correct; several heavily cited papers on any topic are cited because later work disputes them. Books without a DOI are missing, which matters in fields where the founding text is a book.