Wonders

Key research papers on patient safety

Systems thinking, safety culture, teamwork, staffing and staff wellbeing: the patient safety papers cited most, recent reviews and search strings.

Data from OpenAlex, retrieved September 21, 2026

In short

Patient safety research treats harm as a product of systems rather than of careless individuals. Carayon et al. (2006) set out the SEIPS work-system model, Nieva and Sorra (2003) made the case for measuring safety culture, and Manser (2009) reviewed teamwork in operating rooms, intensive care and emergency medicine. A large strand links safety to nurse staffing, hours and burnout: Rogers et al. (2004) on shifts over twelve hours, Aiken et al. (2012) across 12 European countries and the US, Hall et al. (2016) on staff wellbeing. The founding documents of the field are book-length reports, so they are missing from DOI-based lists such as this one.

How the literature is organised

The founding documents of the field are book-length reports rather than journal articles, so the oldest works listed here are from 2003. The journal literature is organised by the part of the system it examines.

One group studies organisations and culture. Nieva and Sorra (2003) set out safety culture assessment as a tool for improvement and described the instruments then available; Azyabi, Karwowski and Davahli (2021) name the ones in use now — the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture, the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire, the Patient Safety Climate in Health Care Organizations, the Modified Stanford Instrument and the Scottish Hospital Safety Questionnaire. A second group applies human factors engineering: Carayon et al. (2006) present the SEIPS model as a framework for relating structures, processes and outcomes in health care, worked through for outpatient surgery. Wiegmann et al. (2022) do the same service for the Swiss cheese model, arguing that the underlying theory of active and latent failures is often misunderstood by both its users and its critics. A third group studies teams: Manser (2009) draws on three lines of evidence — incident analyses, staff perceptions and observational studies of team behaviour — for teamwork in operating rooms, intensive care and emergency medicine, and Aggarwal et al. (2010) review training and simulation.

The fourth group, and the most useful one for nursing students, concerns the workforce. Rogers et al. (2004) had 393 hospital staff nurses keep logbooks and found that about 40% of the 5,317 shifts logged ran beyond twelve hours, with significantly increased error risk on those shifts, on overtime and above forty hours a week. Aiken et al. (2012) surveyed 33,659 nurses and 11,318 patients in 12 European countries plus a US sample and found that nurses in better work environments were half as likely to give their hospital a poor or failing safety grade, while each additional patient per nurse raised those odds. Hall et al. (2016) reviewed 46 studies and found poor wellbeing and burnout associated with worse patient safety in most of them, while noting that the lack of prospective studies makes causality hard to establish. Specific hazards have their own entry points: Burke (2003) on health care-associated infection and Trzeciak and Rivers (2003) on emergency department overcrowding.

Main debates

The first argument is about the systems view itself. Wiegmann et al. (2022) note that some authors dismiss the Swiss cheese model as an oversimplification of how accidents happen while others try to extend it, and their review is an attempt to settle what the theory actually claims before either side proceeds.

The second is about measurement, and it matters for any thesis built on survey data. Vikan et al. (2023) mapped 34 studies of the association between patient safety culture scores and adverse event rates: 76% found that higher culture scores went with fewer adverse events, but the studies differ in the tools they use, the units they measure and what they report, and the review found too few comparable studies to pool. Kakemam et al. (2021), surveying 2,295 nurses in 32 Iranian teaching hospitals, is an example of how the two are usually measured together — both by asking the same nurses. Janes et al. (2021) meta-analysed staff engagement against safety outcomes and found the relationship real but small (r = 0.22), and say plainly that causality is not established.

Where recent work is heading

Recent well-cited work covers clinician welfare after incidents: Vanhaecht et al. (2022) reviewed 83 publications and put a consensus definition of the second victim to an international expert group. Nijor et al. (2022) reviewed 28 studies on information overload in electronic health records and found irrelevant information, poor data display and excessive alerting raising cognitive load and error rates. Dietl et al. (2023) surveyed 137 staff before and after a four-hour communication intervention in two obstetric units and found perceived patient safety risks lower afterwards, though not communication or team performance. Bates et al. (2021) reviewed 392 studies on artificial intelligence across eight harm domains and expect the largest gains where current strategies fail and unstructured data have to be combined — adverse drug events, decompensation and diagnostic errors. Ocloo et al. (2021) reviewed 42 reviews on patient and public involvement and found theory and equality and diversity to be the neglected corners of it.

Most-cited foundational papers

Published before 2021 and ranked by how often later work cites them. Read the abstract of each and the full text of the three or four closest to your question. Citation count measures attention, not quality, so treat this as a map of what the field has argued about rather than a ranking of what is true.

  1. 1
    Patient safety, satisfaction, and quality of hospital care: cross sectional surveys of nurses and patients in 12 countries in Europe and the United States

    L. H. Aiken and 19 others (2012). BMJ.

    Cited by 2,068Open accessdoi:10.1136/bmj.e1717

  2. 2
    Work system design for patient safety: the SEIPS model

    P Carayon and 6 others (2006). Quality and Safety in Health Care.

    Cited by 1,786Open accessdoi:10.1136/qshc.2005.015842

  3. 3
    Healthcare Staff Wellbeing, Burnout, and Patient Safety: A Systematic Review

    Louise H. Hall and 4 others (2016). PLoS ONE.

    Cited by 1,703Open accessdoi:10.1371/journal.pone.0159015

  4. 4
    Teamwork and patient safety in dynamic domains of healthcare: a review of the literature

    T. Manser (2009). Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

    Cited by 1,331doi:10.1111/j.1399-6576.2008.01717.x

  5. 5
    Infection Control — A Problem for Patient Safety

    John P. Burke (2003). New England Journal of Medicine.

    Cited by 1,175doi:10.1056/nejmhpr020557

  6. 6
    Safety culture assessment: a tool for improving patient safety in healthcare organizations

    V F Nieva et al. (2003). Quality and Safety in Health Care.

    Cited by 1,008Open accessdoi:10.1136/qhc.12.suppl_2.ii17

  7. 7
    The Working Hours Of Hospital Staff Nurses And Patient Safety

    Ann E. Rogers and 4 others (2004). Health Affairs.

    Cited by 966doi:10.1377/hlthaff.23.4.202

  8. 8
    Emergency department overcrowding in the United States: an emerging threat to patient safety and public health

    S Trzeciak, E P Rivers (2003). Emergency Medicine Journal.

    Cited by 851Open accessdoi:10.1136/emj.20.5.402

  9. 9
    Patient Participation: Current Knowledge and Applicability to Patient Safety

    Yves Longtin and 5 others (2010). Mayo Clinic Proceedings.

    Cited by 823Open accessdoi:10.4065/mcp.2009.0248

  10. 10
    Training and simulation for patient safety

    R. Aggarwal and 11 others (2010). Quality and Safety in Health Care.

    Cited by 743Open accessdoi:10.1136/qshc.2009.038562

Most-cited papers since 2021

Primary studies and conceptual papers from 2021 onwards. A paper published in 2024 has had a few years to accumulate citations where the works in the section above have had decades, so compare these counts with each other rather than with the ones above.

  1. 1
    Nurse Burnout and Patient Safety, Satisfaction, and Quality of Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Lambert Zixin Li and 5 others (2024). JAMA Network Open.

    Cited by 433Open accessdoi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.43059

  2. 2
    An Evidence and Consensus-Based Definition of Second Victim: A Strategic Topic in Healthcare Quality, Patient Safety, Person-Centeredness and Human Resource Management

    Kris Vanhaecht and 11 others (2022). International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.

    Cited by 175Open accessdoi:10.3390/ijerph192416869

  3. 3
    Assessing Patient Safety Culture in Hospital Settings

    Abdulmajeed Azyabi, Waldemar Karwowski, Mohammad Reza Davahli (2021). International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.

    Cited by 166Open accessdoi:10.3390/ijerph18052466

  4. 4
    Patient Safety Issues From Information Overload in Electronic Medical Records

    Sohn Nijor and 3 others (2022). Journal of Patient Safety.

    Cited by 138Open accessdoi:10.1097/pts.0000000000001002

  5. 5
    Understanding the “Swiss Cheese Model” and Its Application to Patient Safety

    Douglas A. Wiegmann and 3 others (2022). Journal of Patient Safety.

    Cited by 124Open accessdoi:10.1097/pts.0000000000000810

  6. 6
    Interdisciplinary and interprofessional communication intervention: How psychological safety fosters communication and increases patient safety

    Johanna Elisa Dietl and 3 others (2023). Frontiers in Psychology.

    Cited by 111Open accessdoi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1164288

  7. 7
    Nurses’ perception of patient safety culture and its relationship with adverse events: a national questionnaire survey in Iran

    Edris Kakemam and 6 others (2021). BMC Nursing.

    Cited by 107Open accessdoi:10.1186/s12912-021-00571-w

  8. 8
    Interprofessional collaboration as a mediator in the relationship between nurse work environment, patient safety outcomes and job satisfaction among nurses

    Leodoro J. Labrague and 4 others (2022). Journal of Nursing Management.

    Cited by 102doi:10.1111/jonm.13491

Recent reviews and meta-analyses

The fastest way into a literature. A good review gives you the structure of the field, a reference list to mine and, in its limitations section, the gaps other researchers have already spotted.

  1. 1
    Exploring the theory, barriers and enablers for patient and public involvement across health, social care and patient safety: a systematic review of reviews

    Josephine Ocloo and 3 others (2021). Health Research Policy and Systems.

    Cited by 477Open accessdoi:10.1186/s12961-020-00644-3

  2. 2
    The potential of artificial intelligence to improve patient safety: a scoping review

    David W. Bates and 7 others (2021). npj Digital Medicine.

    Cited by 323Open accessdoi:10.1038/s41746-021-00423-6

  3. 3
    The association between patient safety culture and adverse events – a scoping review

    Magnhild Vikan and 5 others (2023). BMC Health Services Research.

    Cited by 129Open accessdoi:10.1186/s12913-023-09332-8

  4. 4
    Nurse Fatigue and Nurse, Patient Safety, and Organizational Outcomes: A Systematic Review

    Hyeonmi Cho, Linsey M. Steege (2021). Western Journal of Nursing Research.

    Cited by 126doi:10.1177/0193945921990892

  5. 5
    Clinical nurse competence and its effect on patient safety culture: a systematic review

    Rasha Abu Zaitoun, Nizar B. Said, Lila de Tantillo (2023). BMC Nursing.

    Cited by 124Open accessdoi:10.1186/s12912-023-01305-w

  6. 6
    The Association Between Health Care Staff Engagement and Patient Safety Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Gillian Janes and 4 others (2021). Journal of Patient Safety.

    Cited by 119Open accessdoi:10.1097/pts.0000000000000807

How big the literature is, and where it is published

OpenAlex indexes 29,830 works whose title matches this topic. The chart shows how many were published each year from 2000 to 2025; the current year is left out because it is incomplete.

2000: 95 works9520002001: 220 works2002: 311 works2003: 348 works2004: 501 works2005: 782 works2006: 669 works2007: 620 works2008: 896 works2009: 852 works2010: 859 works2011: 1,036 works2012: 1,015 works2013: 1,153 works2014: 1,162 works2015: 1,277 works2016: 1,355 works2017: 1,445 works2018: 1,455 works2019: 1,528 works2020: 1,417 works2021: 1,296 works2022: 1,296 works2023: 1,543 works2024: 1,823 works2025: 2,132 works2,1322025
Show the numbers as a table
YearWorks
200095
2001220
2002311
2003348
2004501
2005782
2006669
2007620
2008896
2009852
2010859
20111,036
20121,015
20131,153
20141,162
20151,277
20161,355
20171,445
20181,455
20191,528
20201,417
20211,296
20221,296
20231,543
20241,823
20252,132

Journals behind the most-cited work

Counted across the 372 most-cited works on the topic, not across everything published. Browsing recent issues of the first two or three is a reliable way to find current work that has not yet been cited much.

Sub-topics to narrow into

A thesis-sized question usually sits inside one of these, combined with a population or a setting.

How to cite these papers

Every paper above has a DOI, a part of the reference that is easy to leave out. Here is one of them, “Teamwork and patient safety in dynamic domains of healthcare: a review of the literature” (2009), in the two styles students ask about most:

APA 7th edition

Manser, T. (2009). Teamwork and patient safety in dynamic domains of healthcare: A review of the literature. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 53(2), 143–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.2008.01717.x

MLA 9th edition

Manser, T. “Teamwork and Patient Safety in Dynamic Domains of Healthcare: A Review of the Literature.” Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, vol. 53, no. 2, 2009, pp. 143–51, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.2008.01717.x.

Check the details against the article itself before you submit: databases, including the one behind this page, sometimes carry the online-first year rather than the volume year. Full rules and more examples are in our guides to APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, Vancouver and ABNT, with the rest in the citation guides. You can also format a reference from its DOI with our free citation tools.

Frequently asked questions

Why is To Err Is Human not in this list?

Because this page lists works with the words patient safety in the title, and its title is To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System. It does have a DOI. The National Academies Press gives the citation as Institute of Medicine, 2000, To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, https://doi.org/10.17226/9728. Note the year: the publisher's own record and suggested citation say 2000, so use that rather than the 1999 you will see in some reference lists.

What is patient safety culture and how is it measured?

It is the organisational culture side of safety — Nieva and Sorra (2003) argue that healthcare organisations have to transform their culture to improve patient safety, and set out safety culture assessment as the tool for doing it. In practice it is measured with staff surveys. Azyabi, Karwowski and Davahli (2021) review the instruments used in hospitals and name teamwork, organisational and behavioural learning, error reporting, safety awareness, demographics, work experience and staffing levels among the factors that shape the scores. Say which instrument you used; the scores are not interchangeable.

What are good patient safety topics for a nursing thesis?

Questions where nursing work conditions meet a measurable outcome work well: fatigue and errors (Cho and Steege, 2021), nurse competence and safety culture (Abu Zaitoun et al., 2023), or interprofessional collaboration as a mediator between work environment and safety (Labrague et al., 2022).

How this page was made

The lists come from OpenAlex, an open index of scholarly works whose data are published under a CC0 licence, queried on September 21, 2026 for works whose title matches "patient safety". Only works with a DOI are listed. Each one was checked against the publisher’s own record at Crossref or DataCite (title, year, first author, journal, volume and pages), and in three cases, where the publisher deposited no byline, against PubMed; anything OpenAlex or Crossref flags as retracted was left out, and an editor took out results that matched the words but not the subject. Citation counts are OpenAlex’s on that date and are usually lower than Google Scholar’s, which counts more kinds of document. Ranking by citations tells you what a field has relied on, not what is correct; several heavily cited papers on any topic are cited because later work disputes them. Books without a DOI are missing, which matters in fields where the founding text is a book.

Related research topics

Find your own gap.

Search 320M+ scholarly works on patient safety, keep what matters on a board, and export the references. 14 days free. Students get 50% off.

Start with this topic →