Wonders

The Rabbit Hole · Citation guides

How to Cite a Statute or Act

Cite legislation from the US, UK, Canada and Australia in APA 7, MLA 9, Chicago, Harvard and IEEE, with real Acts taken from each jurisdiction's official legislation site.

Sep 22, 2026
How to Cite a Statute or Act

TL;DR

Every jurisdiction has its own legal citation style, and the general styles mostly defer to it: APA sends US writers to the Bluebook, MLA sends writers outside the US to the Bluebook's foreign tables, and Australian guides use AGLC. Get the Act's exact short title, year and jurisdiction from the official legislation site, cite the version in force on the date you used it, and never cite an Act from a news article's paraphrase.

Legislation is the source type where the general citation styles are least confident. APA's manual refers writers to The Bluebook. MLA tells writers outside the United States to consult the Bluebook's foreign-jurisdiction tables and adapt. The University of Queensland's APA guide notes plainly that APA's approach does not cover Australian material and uses the Australian Guide to Legal Citation instead. So the first question is not "what is the format" but "whose format does my department want".

What does not vary is the underlying discipline: get the Act's exact short title, year, jurisdiction and identifier from the official legislation site, and record which version you read.

Five real Acts appear below. Each was checked on the official site for its jurisdiction on 22 September 2026.

JurisdictionActIdentifier
US federalAmericans with Disabilities Act of 1990Pub. L. No. 101-336, 104 Stat. 327; 42 U.S.C. § 12101
US stateCalifornia Consumer Privacy Act of 2018Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1798.100–1798.199.100
UKEquality Act 20102010 c. 15, Royal Assent 8 April 2010
CanadaCanadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999S.C. 1999, c. 33
AustraliaPrivacy Act 1988No. 119, 1988 (Cth)

What to Collect

Quick Reference by Major Style

APA (7th Edition)

APA defers to The Bluebook for United States material. The format below and its worked example are the ones the Purdue OWL publishes on its APA legal references page:

Name of Act, Title # Source § Section # (Year). URL

Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. (1990).

In-text: (Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990, 1990) — or, as is more usual and more readable, name the Act in your sentence.

The same page notes that some federal statutes carry public law numbers you may use in place of the U.S.C. information, and that state statutes need the Bluebook's state-specific abbreviations, because some states number by chapter or article rather than section. For California, the codified reference to the worked example is Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1798.100–1798.199.100.

For Australian legislation the University of Queensland's APA guide uses AGLC form inside APA:

Short Title of the Act Year (Jurisdiction abbreviation) s. Section number. Web address

Privacy Act 1988 (Cth). https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2004A03712/latest/text

In-text: (Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) s. 6)

MLA (9th Edition)

MLA's own advice, in "Documenting Legal Works in MLA Style", is that nonspecialists may cite legal sources "in one of two ways: strict adherence to the MLA format template or a hybrid method incorporating the standard legal citation into the works-cited-list entry". The same article says that when you cite laws, acts and political documents you "capitalize their names like titles and set them in roman font" — not italics. The advice about other countries is in a separate MLA Style Center post, "How do I cite legal materials from jurisdictions outside the United States?", which says the MLA advises consulting The Bluebook — its table "T2 Foreign Jurisdictions" — and then adapting that citation to MLA style.

MLA's published example of a public law:

United States, Congress. Public Law 111-122. United States Statutes at Large, vol. 123, 2009, pp. 3480-82. U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/STATUTE-123/pdf/STATUTE-123.pdf.

Applying the same pattern to the Act verified for this page:

United States, Congress. Public Law 101-336. United States Statutes at Large, vol. 104, 1990, pp. 327-78. GovInfo, www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/STATUTE-104/pdf/STATUTE-104-Pg327.pdf.

In-text: (United States, Congress)

For a state law, MLA's guidance is to cite the set of laws as a whole and give the chapter and section in your text, or to cite the web page for the individual section, with the legislature as author and the publishing body in the publisher slot.

Chicago (18th Edition)

The Chicago Manual of Style is subscription-only. Murdoch University Library's Chicago 18th edition guide publishes this form for legislation, with the jurisdiction in round brackets:

Title Year (Jurisdiction). Commencement Date. Internet address, if applicable.

Murdoch's own worked example, quoted as published:

Domicile Act 1982 (Cth). January 25 2019. https://www.legislation.gov.au/Series/C2004A02560.

That date is the in-force date of the compilation the entry links to — compilation C2019C00077 of 25 January 2019 on the Federal Register of Legislation. The date slot is not decorative, so do not leave it out. Applying the same shape to the Act verified for this page, whose current compilation on the Federal Register is C2026C00227 of 4 June 2026:

Privacy Act 1988 (Cth). 4 June 2026. https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2004A03712/latest/text.

Murdoch's guidance is to source that commencement or in-force date from the Act itself, so that the reader knows which version you used.

Harvard (Cite Them Right)

The University of Sheffield's Harvard guide, which states that it follows Cite Them Right, gives UK Acts a reference with no separate author or date: the Act's name carries both.

Title of Act including year and chapter number. Available at: URL (Accessed: date).

Equality Act 2010, c. 15. Available at: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/contents (Accessed: 22 September 2026).

In-text: "The Equality Act 2010 introduced…" — the guide notes that the date is not repeated in brackets because it is already in the Act's name.

The University of York's Harvard guide shows the same shape, citing the Act as enacted: Arbitration Act 2025, c.4. Available at: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2025/4/enacted [Accessed 18 March 2025]. Note that York links the "as enacted" text and uses square brackets for the access date; Harvard is a family of variants, so follow the guide your department names.

IEEE

The IEEE Reference Guide has a short section of legal citations. For US laws it gives forms including:

[1] Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, Public Law No. 90-351, sections 801–804, U.S. Statutes at Large, vol. 82, pp. 211–223 (codified as amended in US Code, Title 18, sections 2510–2522, 2000 and 2002 Supplement).

Following that pattern for the Act verified here:

[1] Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Public Law No. 101-336, U.S. Statutes at Large, vol. 104, 1990, p. 327 (codified at US Code, Title 42, sections 12101–12213).

In-text: [1]

Other Jurisdictions

Canada. The Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999, S.C. 1999, c. 33, is on the Justice Laws website, which states the date the consolidation is current to — 21 July 2026 when this page was checked. Canadian legal writing follows the Canadian Guide to Uniform Legal Citation (the McGill Guide); for non-law work, give the short title, the statute citation and the consolidation date.

United Kingdom. Law students use OSCOLA, which has its own rules for primary legislation and a table of legislation rather than a bibliography. See the OSCOLA guide.

Australia. Law students use AGLC. The University of Queensland's guide, which follows AGLC for Australian material, italicises the short title with its year and puts the jurisdiction in round brackets: Privacy Act 1988 (Cth). See the AGLC guide.

United States. Law students use the Bluebook or the ALWD Guide to Legal Citation. See the Bluebook guide and the ALWD guide.

Missing Elements

No chapter number visible. UK Acts always have one; it is at the head of the Act on legislation.gov.uk. Canadian and Australian Acts use different identifiers — S.C. year and chapter, or an Act number and year.

The Act has been renamed or repealed. Cite the title it had when you used it, and say in the text that it has since been repealed, with the repealing Act.

Only a consolidated version is available. Cite it and record the currency date. It is the version that matters for anything you say about the law today.

A bill, not an Act. Say so. A bill that has not received assent is not law, and it is cited by its bill number and session.

Common Mistakes

Sources for These Formats

Full style rules: APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, IEEE, OSCOLA, AGLC, Bluebook.

Wonders has no index of its own: it searches OpenAlex, Semantic Scholar and Google Patents. Legislation itself belongs on the official legislation site, and that is where a reference to it should point.

Frequently asked questions

Do I put the Act in the reference list at all?

It depends on the style. Harvard guides based on Cite Them Right list the Act in the reference list and use the Act's name and year as the in-text citation, with no separate bracketed date, because the year is already in the Act's name. APA lists statutes in the reference list too. The specialist legal styles handle legislation differently again; see the OSCOLA and AGLC guides for those.

Which version of an Act do I cite?

The one you read. UK, Canadian and Australian legislation sites all serve both the Act as enacted and the Act as currently in force, and they differ. The Canadian site states the date the consolidation is current to, and the Australian site labels each compilation; record that date.

How do I cite a section rather than the whole Act?

Put the section in the citation, using the jurisdiction's abbreviation: s. 4 in the UK and Australia, § 12101 in the US, s 5 in Canada. The University of Queensland's APA guide shows the section inside the in-text citation for Australian Acts, as in (Major Events Act 2014 (Qld) s. 3).

My Act has been amended. Does the year change?

No. The short title keeps the year the Act was passed. Amendments are cited separately, or you cite the consolidated version and give the date it was current to. Changing the year in the short title would make the Act impossible to find.

Should I use OSCOLA or AGLC instead?

If you are writing law in the UK or Australia, yes — those are the styles your department expects. See the [OSCOLA guide](/guides/citations/oscola) and the [AGLC guide](/guides/citations/aglc). This page is for everyone else: the historian, the policy student, the engineer whose report cites one regulation.

More useful guides

All citation guides

Finding these guides useful?

Try these techniques in Wonders — an AI workspace for literature review. 14 days free. Students get 50% off.

Start free →